![]() This, at least, is what we see in front of the cameras. On Sunday mornings, for many years now there has been a TV programme on Rai Uno with information, gags and insights, always presented by the same anchor, who, in turn, always has a composed attitude, showing understanding towards the problems of society, and in particular those that affect people directly. Now that the programme and the RAI reprimand are over, there is talk that he will be back in September to conduct a new programme. Many behaviours which would normally be judged “immoral” are acceptable if enacted by somebody who enjoys the public’s favour.”įlavio Insinna: everybody knows the indecent show that was disclosed to the public when some Affari tuoi contestants revealed the true nature of his “do-gooding” conduction in front of the cameras he did not miss a chance to be kind and compassionate to the weaker, except that, backstage, he was immensely vulgar and cruel to the contestants, he insulted and humiliated them. The correctness or incorrectness of moral behaviour, the way it is shown on television, depends on whether the action is performed by a captivating and admired character, or by a disagreeable person who inspires mistrust. Here we read: “We have thus established that the morality of a specific action depends on who performs the action. Popper and John Condry, titled Cattiva maestra televisione (Television: a Bad Teacher). A few years ago they published a booklet by *Karl R. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |